[Football- Champions League] 2.11/ 21:00 Chelsea- Dinamo Zagreb

BTTS (Both Teams to Score) @1,90

Section where old picks from VIP Zone are being moved and summarized.

Partners Turn Off AdBlock if you don't see banners below:



Post Reply
User avatar
Steve
Posts: 371
Joined: 16 Aug 2020 12:53

[Football- Champions League] 2.11/ 21:00 Chelsea- Dinamo Zagreb

Post by Steve » 02 Nov 2022 18:39

[Football- Champions League] 2.11/ 21:00 Chelsea- Dinamo Zagreb

Chelsea has nothing to play for. They already claimed the first spot in their Champions League group. It doesn't matter how the games are ending today. In case Chelsea gets an L and Milan gets a W, Chelsea would be still at the number 1 spot as they won the head-to-head to Milan, which is the tiebreaker. Additionally, Chelsea has very tough games ahead of them. At first, they're squaring off against Premier League leader Arsenal at the weekend and a couple of days later they will face Manchester City and directly afterwards they'll play against Newcastle, which is the dark horse of the Premier League. Against Zagreb, Chelsea gonna safe energy for the upcoming challenging games. That makes it easier for Zagreb to score.

Chelsea is missing goalkeeper Arrizabalaga, who’s team manager Potter's first-choice. He'll be replaced by Mendy, who's lacking match practice as he played just 45 minutes in 2 months. Good chances for Zagreb to get the ball behind the rusty goalie. Brighton was able to net 4 times against Chelsea at the last weekend.

Zagreb can't reach anymore the 2nd spot as they lost the head-to-head tiebreaker to Milan. But they still have the chance on the 3rd spot and the Europa League. They’ve something to play for. It's a tough challenge to get the 3rd spot for them, though. They need to be very aggressive offensively to get something out of the game, which opens things up for Chelsea's strikers and Zagreb 's defense isn't that reliable. We have a good value pick here for both teams to score, fam.

BTTS (Both Teams to Score) @1,90 1xbet

FT 2:1

Post Reply